ACLU Challenges Defense Department Personnel Policy To Regard Lawful Protests As “Low-Level Terrorism” (6/10/2009)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:
202.675.2312 or media@dcaclu.org
Anti-terrorism
training materials currently being used by the Department of Defense (DoD) teach
its personnel that free expression in the form of public protests should be
regarded as “low level terrorism.” ACLU attorneys are calling the approach “an
egregious insult to constitutional values” and have sent a letter to the
Department of Defense demanding that the offending materials be changed and that
the DoD send corrective information to all DoD employees who received the
erroneous training.
“DoD employees
cannot fully protect our nation and its values unless they understand that a
core American value is the constitutional right to criticize our government
through protest activities,” said ACLU of Northern California attorney Ann
Brick. “It is fundamentally wrong to equate activism with terrorism.”
Among the
multiple-choice questions included in its Level 1 Antiterrorism Awareness
training course, the DoD asks the following: “Which of the following is an
example of low-level terrorist activity?”
To answer correctly, the examinee must select “protests.”
The ACLU sent a
letter today to Gail McGinn, Acting Under-Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness, asking that the materials be corrected immediately. The
ACLU points out that the misinterpretation of First Amendment freedoms is
particularly disturbing when viewed in the context of a larger, long-term
pattern of domestic security initiatives by the government that have attempted
to treat lawful dissent as terrorism. Examples of this shameful pattern can be
seen in the Pentagon’s monitoring of at
least 186 anti-military protests, the FBI’s surveillance of potential
protesters at the Republican National Convention, the Fresno County Sheriff Anti-Terrorism
Unit’s infiltration and surveillance of Peace Fresno, a community peace and social justice
organization and the covert
surveillance by the Maryland State Police of local peace and anti-death penalty
groups.
“Teaching employees that dissent on
issues of public concern is something to be feared, rather than respected, is a
dangerously counterproductive use of scarce security resources, making us less
safe and less democratic,” said Michael German, ACLU National Security Policy
Counsel and former FBI Special Agent, who co-signed the letter with Brick.
The Level 1
Antiterrorism Awareness training course is an annual training requirement for
all DoD personnel that is fulfilled through web-based
instruction.
To read the
ACLU’s letter to the DoD, go to: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/39820leg20090610.html
|